The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing: an event-related potentials study
Por favor, use este identificador para citas ou ligazóns a este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10347/17938
Ficheiros no ítem
Metadatos do ítem
Título: | The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing: an event-related potentials study |
Autor/a: | Doallo Pesado, Sonia Lorenzo López, Laura Vizoso Gómez, Carmen Rodríguez Holguín, Socorro Amenedo Losada, María Elena Bará Viñas, Salvador Xurxo Cadaveira Mahía, Fernando |
Centro/Departamento: | Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Física Aplicada Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psicoloxía Clínica e Psicobioloxía |
Palabras chave: | Visuospatial attention | Central cues | Peripheral cues | P1 | Event-related potentials | ERPs | Atención visoespacial | Chaves centrais | Chaves periféricas | Potenciais evocados | |
Data: | 2004 |
Editor: | Elsevier |
Cita bibliográfica: | Doallo S; Lorenzo-López L; Vizoso C, Rodríguez Holguín S, Amenedo E, Bará S, Cadaveira F. (2004). The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing: an event-related potentials study. Clinical Neurophysiology 115, 199–210 |
Resumo: | Objective: The varying results of visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of central and peripheral cueing suggest that these types of cue may modulate stimuli processing with different time courses. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in the time course of facilitatory effects on the visual processing induced by peripheral and central cues. Methods: ERPs were recorded for visual target stimuli that were preceded by informative-central, informative-peripheral or uninformative-peripheral cues with stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 100, 300, 500 or 700 ms. Results: Validly cued stimuli elicited an enhanced P1 component with peripheral cueing at 100 ms SOA. P1 amplitude in valid trials was reduced at 300, 500 and 700 ms SOAs with uninformative-peripheral cueing, but only at 500 ms SOA with informative-peripheral cueing. With informative-central cueing, there was no validity effect on P1. Conclusions: These results suggest that the automatic attraction of attention by a peripheral cue results in improved sensory processing at the cued location. This facilitation is replaced by an inhibitory effect when SOA increases, although cue informativeness may modulate this effect. Central cueing does not affect sensory processing at the P1 level |
Versión do editor: | https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00317-1 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10347/17938 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00317-1 |
ISSN: | 1388-2457 |
E-ISSN: | 1872-8952 |
Dereitos: | © 2004 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Coleccións
-
- FA-Artigos [288]
- NECeA-Artigos [107]
- PCP-Artigos [345]