Response of Three Different Viruses to Interferon Priming and Dithiothreitol Treatment of Avian Cells
Por favor, use este identificador para citas ou ligazóns a este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10347/18338
Ficheiros no ítem
Metadatos do ítem
Título: | Response of Three Different Viruses to Interferon Priming and Dithiothreitol Treatment of Avian Cells |
Autor/a: | Lostalé Seijo, Irene Martínez Costas, José Manuel Benavente Martínez, Francisco Javier |
Centro/Departamento: | Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Centro de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Bioquímica e Bioloxía Molecular |
Data: | 2016 |
Editor: | American Society for Microbiology |
Cita bibliográfica: | Lostalé-Seijo I, Martínez-Costas J, Benavente J. 2016. Response of three different viruses to interferon priming and dithiothreitol treatment of avian cells. J Virol 90:8328 –8340. doi:10.1128/JVI.01175-16 |
Resumo: | We have previously shown that the replication of avian reovirus (ARV) in chicken cells is much more resistant to interferon (IFN) than the replication of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) or vaccinia virus (VV). In this study, we have investigated the role that the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-activated protein kinase (PKR) plays in the sensitivity of these three viruses toward the antiviral action of chicken interferon. Our data suggest that while interferon priming of avian cells blocks vaccinia virus replication by promoting PKR activation, the replication of vesicular stomatitis virus appears to be blocked at a pretranslational step. Our data further suggest that the replication of avian reovirus in chicken cells is quite resistant to interferon priming because this virus uses strategies to downregulate PKR activation and also because translation of avian reovirus mRNAs is more resistant to phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of initiation factor eIF2 than translation of their cellular counterparts. Our results further reveal that the avian reovirus protein sigmaA is able to prevent PKR activation and that this function is dependent on its double-stranded RNA-binding activity. Finally, this study demonstrates that vaccinia virus and avian reovirus, but not vesicular stomatitis virus, express/induce factors that counteract the ability of dithiothreitol to promote eIF2 phosphorylation. Our data demonstrate that each of the three different viruses used in this study elicits distinct responses to interferon and to dithiothreitol-induced eIF2 phosphorylation when infecting avian cells |
Versión do editor: | https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01175-16 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10347/18338 |
DOI: | 10.1128/JVI.01175-16 |
ISSN: | 0022-538X |
E-ISSN: | 1098-5514 |
Dereitos: | © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved |
Coleccións
-
- BBM-Artigos [91]
- CIQUS-Artigos [475]