Decision Making Impairment: A Shared Vulnerability in Obesity, Gambling Disorder and Substance Use Disorders?
Por favor, use este identificador para citas ou ligazóns a este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10347/22997
Ficheiros no ítem
Metadatos do ítem
Título: | Decision Making Impairment: A Shared Vulnerability in Obesity, Gambling Disorder and Substance Use Disorders? |
Autor/a: | Mallorquí Bagué, Nuria Fagundo, Ana Beatriz Jiménez Murcia, Susana Torre, Rafael de la Baños, Rosa M. Botella, Cristina Casanueva Freijo, Felipe Crujeiras Martínez, Ana Belén Fernández García, José C. Fernández Real, José Manuel Frühbeck, Gema Granero, Roser Rodríguez, Amaia Tolosa Sola, Iris Ortega, Francisco J. Tinahones Madueño, Francisco José Álvarez Moya, Eva Ochoa, Cristian Menchón, José M. Fernández Aranda, Fernando |
Centro/Departamento: | Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radioloxía, Saúde Pública, Enfermaría e Medicina |
Palabras chave: | Decision making | Learning | Cognitive impairment | Behavioral addiction | Obesity | Addiction | Gambling | Neuropsychological testing | |
Data: | 2016 |
Editor: | Plos |
Cita bibliográfica: | Mallorquí-Bagué N, Fagundo AB, Jimenez-Murcia S, de la Torre R, Baños RM, Botella C, et al. (2016) Decision Making Impairment: A Shared Vulnerability in Obesity, Gambling Disorder and Substance Use Disorders? PLoS ONE 11(9): e0163901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163901 |
Resumo: | Introduction Addictions are associated with decision making impairments. The present study explores decision making in Substance use disorder (SUD), Gambling disorder (GD) and Obesity (OB) when assessed by Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and compares them with healthy controls (HC). Methods For the aims of this study, 591 participants (194 HC, 178 GD, 113 OB, 106 SUD) were assessed according to DSM criteria, completed a sociodemographic interview and conducted the IGT. Results SUD, GD and OB present impaired decision making when compared to the HC in the overall task and task learning, however no differences are found for the overall performance in the IGT among the clinical groups. Results also reveal some specific learning across the task patterns within the clinical groups: OB maintains negative scores until the third set where learning starts but with a less extend to HC, SUD presents an early learning followed by a progressive although slow improvement and GD presents more random choices with no learning. Conclusions Decision making impairments are present in the studied clinical samples and they display individual differences in the task learning. Results can help understanding the underlying mechanisms of OB and addiction behaviors as well as improve current clinical treatments. |
Versión do editor: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163901 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10347/22997 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0163901 |
E-ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Dereitos: | © 2016 Mallorquí-Bagué et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited |
Coleccións
-
- PRSP-Artigos [373]