Subgingival microbiota in health compared to periodontitis and the influence of smoking
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10347/23030
Files in this item
Metadata
Title: | Subgingival microbiota in health compared to periodontitis and the influence of smoking |
Author: | Camelo Castillo, Anny J. Mira, Alex Pico Blanco, Alexandre Nibali, Luigi Henderson, Brian Donos, Nikolaos Tomás Carmona, Inmaculada |
Affiliation: | Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Cirurxía e Especialidades Médico-Cirúrxicas |
Subject: | 16S ribosomal RNA | Chroni periodontitis | Dental plaque | Microbiome | Oral health | Smoking | |
Date of Issue: | 2015 |
Publisher: | Frontiers Media |
Citation: | Camelo-Castillo AJ, Mira A, Pico A, Nibali L, Henderson B, Donos N and Tomás I (2015) Subgingival microbiota in health compared to periodontitis and the influence of smoking. Front. Microbiol. 6:119. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00119 |
Abstract: | Background: Age determination has great importance in many clinical decisions, being commonly used in odontopediatrics, orthodontics, pediatrics, and forensic medicine. The Nolla and Demirjian et al. methods have been used for these purposes. However, estimating chronological age by means of the dental mineralization stage is not a straightforward analysis, and it is fundamental to test the validity of these methods and their applicability to populations. In this article we intend to compare the accuracy of estimating chronological age from dental age measured with the Nolla and Demirjian methods in a Portuguese and Spanish sample, considering the variables of sex and age-group. Methods: The sample was composed of 821 orthopantomographs of healthy Portuguese (n = 270) and Spanish (n = 551) subjects from 4 to 34 years old. For the Nolla and Demirjian methods, seven mandibular left teeth were examined, staged according to the dental maturity scale of each method. We obtained a good index of inter-rater agreement, a good internal consistency for the teeth assessment, and a good temporal consistency. Results: Dental age was calculated for each method. The Demirjian et al. method tends to overestimate the real age of participants and the Nolla method tends to underestimate it. The accuracy of both methods varied between the sexes and age groups. Both methods were found to be more precise with males. As the age-group increases, the predictive capacities of both methods diminish. The Nolla method was more accurate than the Demirjian method in early and late childhood for both sexes. Neither method could predict chronological age in adults. Conclusions: We can estimate chronological age for early and late childhood, through the Nolla and Demirjian methods, with the former showing greater predictive capacities than the latter. The Demirjian method tends to overestimate age and the Nolla method tends to underestimate it, leading to the importance of forming regression equations adapted to the population studied. Nolla and Demirjian formulas adapted to our sample were created as a function of sex and age-group. |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00119 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10347/23030 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00119 |
E-ISSN: | 1664-302X |
Rights: | © 2014 Tomás et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated |
Collections
-
- EST-Artigos [91]
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2014 Tomás et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated